Quality of Dementia Care in the Community: Identifying Key Quality Assurance Components

Authors

  • George A. Heckman Research Institute for Aging - University of Waterloo
  • Veronique M. Boscart Conestoga College’s School of Health & Life Sciences and Community Services, Schlegel Villages, and Schlegel - University of Waterloo Research Institute for Aging
  • Bryan B. Franco School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo
  • Loretta Hillier Specialized Geriatric Services, St. Joseph's Health Care London
  • Lauren Crutchlow University of Western Ontario
  • Linda Lee McMaster University
  • Frank Molnar University of Ottawa
  • Dallas Seitz Queen's University
  • Paul Stolee University of Waterloo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.19.233

Keywords:

quality improvement, primary care, chronic disease management, dementia, quality indicators, system integration

Abstract

Background

Primary care-based memory clinics (PCMCs) have been established in several jurisdictions to improve the care for persons with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. We sought to identify key quality indicators (QIs), quality improvement mechanisms, and potential barriers and facilitators to the establishment of a quality assurance framework for PCMCs.

Methods

We employed a Delphi approach to obtain consensus from PCMC clinicians and specialist physicians on QIs and quality improvement mechanisms. Thirty-eight candidate QIs and 19 potential quality improvement mechanisms were presented to participants in two rounds of electronic Delphi surveys. Written comments were collected and descriptively analyzed.

Results

The response rate for the first and second rounds were 21.3% (n = 179) and 12.8% (n = 88), respectively. The majority of respondents were physicians. Fourteen QIs remained after the consensus process. Ten quality improvement mechanisms were selected with those characterized by specialist integration, such as case discussions and mentorships, being ranked highly. Written comments revealed three major themes related to potential barriers and facilitators to quality assurance: 1) perceived importance, 2) collaboration and role clarity, and  3) implementation process.

Conclusion

We successfully utilized a consultative process among primary and specialty providers to identify core QIs and quality improvement mechanisms for PCMCs. Identified quality improvement mechanisms highlight desire for multi-modal education. System integration and closer integration between PCMCs and specialists were emphasized as essential for the provision of high-quality dementia care in community settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2016-10-31

How to Cite

1.
Heckman GA, Boscart VM, Franco BB, Hillier L, Crutchlow L, Lee L, Molnar F, Seitz D, Stolee P. Quality of Dementia Care in the Community: Identifying Key Quality Assurance Components. Can Geriatr J [Internet]. 2016 Oct. 31 [cited 2024 Apr. 17];19(4):164-81. Available from: https://cgjonline.ca/index.php/cgj/article/view/233

Issue

Section

Original Research